Three Ways Trump is Using COVID-19 as an Excuse to Harm Migrants

Mother with her three kids.
(Photo Credit: Lynda M. Gonzalez)

Since Donald Trump has taken office, his administration has dedicated considerable resources to eviscerating legal protections for migrants. Trump’s legal advisers have meticulously parsed out and changed immigration law to make it functionally impossible for someone to be granted relief in the U.S. Indeed, ostensibly to stop the spread of COVID-19, the Trump administration has effectively shut down the border. Here are 3 of the most recent and insidious ways Trump is using COVID-19 to exacerbate the border crisis he help create:

Denying Due Process to Asylum Seekers, Including Children

Using the COVID-19 as an excuse, the Trump administration has created a “shadow system” of immigration where unaccompanied children are being held, not in government custody as would usually be the case, but in private hotels after cursory screenings from border officials and without the legally mandated hearing before an immigration judge. These children are held for undetermined periods of time, without access to counsel or family members, and in unclear custody. Thousands of children have been “expelled,” a euphemism for deported without due process, since March under this provision. Despite the right-wing dream of shutting down the border to any new migrant, asylum seekers are still in search of refuge and the United States is still party to treaties that obligate it to offer asylum to those who qualify for it. Squalid makeshift camps, a recipe for rapid COVID-19 spread, have been created along the US/Mexico border as people are left without support from either country indefinitely, hoping the border will eventually reopen. Earlier this month, a Guatemalan man drowned in the Rio Grande attempting to cross into the U.S. after waiting 8 months in one of these border camps.

Trump continues to build an expensive and unnecessary wall, damaging sacred indigenous sites

The Trump administration continues to build a border wall despite desecrating sacred indigenous sites in doing so, ignoring the demands of indigenous communities and allies to stop construction, and creating more deadly opportunities for COVID-19 to spread. The planned area for construction contains multiple sacred sites to the O’odham people including carved rock formations likely used as ceremonial spaces by O’odham ancestors and a burial site. U.S. Customs and Border Protection waived multiple laws, including some meant to preserve sacred indigenous sites and artifacts, in order to speed up construction in Arizona. Now, thousands of construction workers from all over the country are flooding rural border towns and are housed in cramped quarters as wall construction continues.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) continues to mismanage the spread of COVID-19 within its facilities

COVID-19 rages inside of ICE detention facilities, including in La Palma Correctional Center in Southern Arizona, where 233 additional confirmed cases spiked days ago. The facility now has the highest number of active COVID-19 cases of any ICE facility in the country. A 50 year-old Honduran man who was held at a Texas ICE facility is the latest person to have died from COVID-19 while in custody. He was the seventh detainee to die from COVID-related reasons and the nineteenth detainee to die in ICE custody during the 2020 fiscal year.

The Trump administration’s claims of shutting down the border to stop COVID-19 is just another example of this administration’s reckless mismanagement of the pandemic and of doing more to spread the virus than to stop it.

an image of a pile of books

This article is part of a series developed in partnership with Project Pulso.

Latino history is vital to the American narrative - there is no America without Latino contributions. Despite this, Latino storytelling and history are increasingly being sidelined in educational institutions. The issue deepens when we look at the emerging trend of book banning.

What is the Modern Book Ban?

Book banning is the act of removing books from reading lists, libraries, or bookstores based on content disagreements. Often done with the pretense of safeguarding children, the majority of these challenges come from parents and library patrons. However, elected officials, school boards, and even librarians can also be champions of imposed ignorance - after all, they know knowledge is power.

Recently, the ALA reported an "unprecedented volume" of book challenges. This is alarming for multiple reasons:

  • Censorship: Book banning is fundamentally a form of censorship. Although the First Amendment protects against government censorship, private individuals or organizations face limited restraint. This makes book banning a primary example of legal censorship in the U.S.
  • Democracy at Risk: At the core of democracy is the free exchange of ideas. By constraining this, we challenge the principles on which the U.S. was built. Censorship often paves the way to tyranny, allowing a small group to dominate the narrative.
  • Stagnation: Book bans impede societal progression by avoiding challenges to prevailing beliefs. To quote English writer George Orwell from his eerily prescient dystopian novel “1984”: “The best books are those that tell you what you know already.” Do we aspire to a society that shuns diverse thought? Book bans lead fully in that direction.
Marginalization: Such bans further alienate underrepresented communities. With Latinos already underrepresented in literature, these bans exacerbate the problem.

Latino Representation: The Understated Crisis

Despite making up a significant portion of the K-12 public school population, Latino students are presented with textbooks that overlook or barely touch upon key topics in Latino history. Out of the books published for young readers, only 5% concern or are authored by Latinos. This void extends beyond just fictional narratives.

Recent bans in states like Texas and Florida are erasing the already sparse representation Latinos have. Essential books reflecting Latino experiences, such as My Name is María Isabel, are disappearing from shelves. Project Pulso underlines this issue in their post:

Even beyond Latino literature, there's a broader attack against critical theory. This crusade aims to stifle discussions on racism, sexism, and systemic inequality. In a single year, 2,539 books faced bans, according to PEN America. A startling number of these pertained to LGBTQ themes, protagonists of color, race, and racism.

A Spotlight on Banned Latina Authors

Amidst the unsettling rise in book bans across the U.S., Latina authors have found themselves at the epicenter of this censorship storm. These authors not only highlight the complexities of Latino heritage but also bridge gaps in understanding, weaving tales that resonate across boundaries. Many invaluable works by Latina authors have been banned, including:

  • “The House of the Spirits” by Isabel Allende: Spanning generations, this saga chronicles the lives of the Trueba family in Chile, accentuating the mystical powers of its female characters. Challenges against it cite reasons like its "pornographic" nature and alleged attacks on Catholicism.
  • “The House on Mango Street” by Sandra Cisneros: Through vignettes, this novel paints the life of Esperanza Cordero, a young Chicana in Chicago. Bans have been enforced based on claims that it instigates skepticism against "American values."
  • “Out of Darkness” by Ashley Hope Pérez: Set against the backdrop of 1930s Texas, this novel delves into the love between a Mexican American girl and a Black teen. Challenged for its graphic nature, it's deemed "sexually explicit" and has earned a place on the Top 10 Most Banned Books list.
  • “The Poet X” by Elizabeth Acevedo: The narrative revolves around 15-year-old Xiomara, who channels familial tension into her poetry. Accusations against it range from being "anti-Christian" to violating religious safeguards.
  • “How the Garcia Girls Lost Their Accents” by Julia Alvarez: This novel charts the journey of the Garcia sisters, uprooted from their Dominican heritage, as they grapple with a starkly contrasting life in New York, touching on themes of identity, family, and culture.
  • “Like Water for Chocolate” by Laura Esquivel: This enchanting novel narrates the intriguing history of the De La Garza family in Mexico, where love, tradition, and magic blend seamlessly. It delves deep into themes of forbidden love, family obligations, and the transformative power of food.
  • “Bless Me, Ultima” by Rudolf Anaya: Set in New Mexico; this narrative introduces us to Antonio Marez and Ultima, a healer. As Antonio steps into manhood, Ultima becomes his guiding light, illuminating his path through childhood bigotry, familial crises, and the mysteries of spirituality.

The increasing trend of book banning, especially of Latino literature, is a pressing concern. Not only does it threaten our democratic principles and societal growth, but it also amplifies the marginalization of already underrepresented communities. Our society's richness lies in its diversity, and by stifling these voices, we risk losing an integral part of our narrative. It's time to reassess and recognize the value of all stories, regardless of their origin.