In The Community
The recent situation in Venezuela is a stark reminder that many countries in the world are currently under a dictatorship. While the people are doing everything they can to get rid of oppressive regimes, those regimes seem to prevail. They’re like stubborn stains; tough to get rid of but not impossible. Latin America has had its fair share of authoritarian regimes, teaching us valuable lessons about resilience and hope. Today, we thought we would explore 8 of the main reasons why these regimes are hard to overthrow, but understanding that dictatorships don’t last forever:
They have control over the military
Photo by Matias Luge on UnsplashDictators often secure their grip by controlling the military and then they use armed forces to maintain power instead of protecting the people. However, history shows that military loyalty isn’t guaranteed forever. Eventually, motivations and goals stop aligning, and the tides start turning.
They have sturdy propaganda machines
Photo by Sinitta Leunen on UnsplashFrom controlling the media to spreading fake news, dictatorships thrive on propaganda. They paint themselves as the saviors and anyone opposing them as enemies. Yet, the rise of the internet and social media means the truth can still seep through the cracks. The more people are exposed to the truth and unbiased information, the less effective propaganda will be.
They practice political repression
Photo by Shalom de León on UnsplashDictatorships are notorious for silencing dissent through arrests and more extreme measures like torture and even death. Despite this, movements like those in Venezuela and Cuba demonstrate that the human spirit can’t be easily crushed. Despite losses, the people are willing to sacrifice to achieve freedom. If not for themselves, then for their neighbors or the next generation.
They often have foreign support
Photo by Christine Roy on UnsplashSome dictatorships survive thanks to foreign aid and alliances. For example, some Latin American dictators received support from powerful countries. But international pressure can also be a game-changer, as seen with the global stance against apartheid in South Africa.
They manipulate the culture
Photo by Liza Summer
Dictatorships often exploit nationalistic sentiments and cultural narratives to legitimize their rule. They rewrite history and manipulate symbols to get the people on their side to support their own suffering. Still, grassroots cultural movements and the preservation of true historical narratives keep hope alive.
They rely on fear and intimidation
Photo by Khaled Ali on UnsplashFear is a dictator's best friend. People are often too scared to rise against the regime, but bravery is contagious. The courage of a few can inspire many and mobilize the entire country (sometimes even the entire world), leading to mass movements like the ones seen in Nicaragua and Guatemala.
They cause division among the opposition
Photo by Marta Nogueira
Dictators often exploit divisions within opposition groups to maintain power. However, as seen in many Latin American countries, unity among opposition forces can lead to powerful coalitions capable of challenging dictators. A common goal and common desire to do what it takes to obtain freedom can lead to powerful coalitions capable of challenging dictators and lead to change.
They create a perception of invincibility
Photo by Pixabay
Dictators often seem invincible, convincing people that resistance won’t accomplish anything. But history has shown that no dictatorship is unbreakable and they all eventually do topple. From Argentina’s military junta to the fall of Fujimori in Peru, historical precedent tells us that dictatorships can and do fall.
So, while dictatorships are indeed difficult to topple, they’re not invincible. The power of the people, the resilience of the human spirit, and the relentless pursuit of justice can and will lead to brighter, freer days. History’s on the side of people who stand against tyranny!
- 5 Latina Activists Disrupting the Political Status Quo ›
- Books Are Inherently Political: It's Why They Are Burned and Banned ›
Bill Seeks Reparations for Mexican American Families Forcibly Displaced to Build Dodger Stadium
A new bill introduced in the California Legislature aims to address a historical injustice by seeking reparations for families who were forcibly displaced from their homes in Los Angeles in the 1950s to make way for what is now the Dodger Stadium. The proposed legislation, named the “Chavez Ravine Accountability Act”, represents a significant step toward acknowledging and rectifying the harm done to the Mexican American community.
The story of the Chavez Ravine displacement has been well-documented, but it has taken over 70 years for those affected to see some kind of acknowledgment. In recent years, descendants of marginalized communities in California, who founded the nonprofit organization Buried Under the Blue, have had success seeking reparations for land that was taken from them, and this bill is a reminder that the hard work they’ve put in hasn’t been in vain.
A panoramic view of Chávez Ravine, showing the residential community. The Los Angeles Civic Center is visible in the background. Photo by Leonard Nadel, courtesy of the Photo Collection, Los Angeles Public Library.
The Shameful Displacement of the Chavez Ravine
The Chavez Ravine, the land on which the Dodger Stadium has been standing for 62 years, used to be a vibrant community of Mexican Americans. Despite being labeled a "poor man’s Shangri La," it was a self-sufficient city covering over 300 acres. However, in the early 1950s, the Los Angeles City Housing Authority set its sights on it for redevelopment.
Claiming “urban renewal,” residents of the Chavez Ravine received letters demanding the sale of their homes for a proposed housing project called “Elysian Park Heights.” Many of the residents were promised housing when the project was completed, but most of them received a small compensation or nothing at all. The displacement of the Chavez Ravine was violent and traumatic, as people were forcibly removed from their homes, which were later demolished.
One of the figures of Latino resistance who stand out in this dark episode of L.A. history is Aurora Vargas, known as “Lola,” who reportedly said, 'They'll have to carry me [out].” That’s exactly what they did, prompting the infamous image of Vargas being carried out by a group of deputies as she refused to leave her home behind, fighting until the last moment. Vargas wasn’t the only one who resisted, and the displacement was marked by adults and children screaming and crying hysterically.
Several Chávez Ravine residents fought eviction, including Aurora Vargas, who vowed that, "they'll have to carry me [out]." Here, L.A. County Sheriffs forcibly remove Vargas from her home. Bulldozers then knocked over the few remaining dwellings; four months later, ground-breaking for Dodger Stadium began. Photograph dated May 8, 1959.Herald-Examiner Collection/Los Angeles Public Library Collection
The promised housing project never came to be because once the land was cleared, the owner of the Brooklyn Dodgers, Walter O’Malley, saw the opportunity to secure the land for a fraction of what it was worth. Eventually, the Dodger Stadium was built, betraying the promises made to the Chavez Ravine residents who ended up homeless, struggling to get back on their feet.
What Does This Chavez Ravine Accountability Act Mean?
Written by Assemblywoman Wendy Carrillo, a Democrat from Los Angeles, the “Chavez Ravine Accountability Act” is the response to long-standing demands from organizers and descendants of the displaced families for restitution. If passed, a nine-member task force will be created to oversee the compensation process for all the families.
The bill emphasizes the injustice displaced families experienced, emphasizing that they weren’t only removed from their homes, but also deprived of the opportunity to own homes and create intergenerational wealth. Moreover, it offers different forms of compensation for the families, including city-owned land or fair-market-value payments.
Another key aspect of the bill is that, if passed, it will lead to the establishment of a permanent memorial at the site to honor the displaced families and preserve the memory of their communities. Additionally, a searchable database detailing the history of land acquisition will be created to facilitate the verification of eligible recipients.
The bill has garnered support from descendants of the displaced families, including Melissa Arechiga, Jeannie Arechiga, and Vincent Montalvo, who founded the nonprofit organization Buried Under the Blue to raise awareness about the displacement's legacy. While the Arechigas and Montalvo are grateful for this step in the right direction, they’re also advocating for the Dodgers to be involved in the reparations because they continue to benefit from the land.
What Comes Next?
While the introduction of this bill is a significant milestone, there’s still a long way to go. The legislative process is long and the bill requires consideration by the California Assembly's Judiciary Committee, approval by both chambers of the State Legislature, and the signature of Governor Gavin Newsom before it can become law.
For advocates and the affected community, the bill validates their efforts and it means a step toward rectifying a historical injustice that has been ignored for so long. It also echoes the strength and spirit of resistance shown by people like Aurora Vargas, and it offers the families hope for healing after their lives were altered so drastically.
La Malinche is one of the most well-known historical figures and representatives of indigenous women in Mexico. Also known as Maltintzin, Malinalli, or Doña Marina (as the Spanish called her), she was known as Hernán Cortés’s translator during the Spanish conquest. As a result, La Malinche has been perceived as a traitor to her own people, something that has been memorialized in Mexican slang. Being called a “malinchista” is the same as being called disloyal or a traitor to one’s country and culture.
However, it’s important to remember that we know very little of her life or her experiences as Cortés’s translator from her perspective. Instead, her story has been consistently appropriated, retold, and altered in post-colonial Mexico by intellectuals and their political agendas.
If a truly thoughtful analysis is the end goal, different lenses should be considered when looking at historical figures. La Malinche is no exception to that. Rather than revisiting the narrative of betrayal, what would it look like to consider her life through the lens of resistance, resilience, intelligence, and survival?
La Malinche 101: Who Was She?
Malinche started as a domestic slave to Cortés, but since she dominated the Mayana, Nahuatl, and Spanish languages, she quickly became indispensable to the Spanish conquistador as an interpreter. Her role focused on facilitating communication, but she wasn’t just a translator, she was compelling and gifted at creating political connections.
This is how she became caught between two empires.
Many accounts speak of how she became Cortés’ lover as well, but there’s nothing that indicates there was actual love between them or that Malinche was a willing participant. Whether or not she was helpful to Cortés, she was still a slave. But what’s known for sure is that they had a physical relationship, which resulted in a son and one of the first mestizos, Martín Cortés.
Where the “Traitor” Label Comes From
The most interesting thing about Malinche is that she was adaptable and resilient. Those characteristics drove her decisions, which then made her the perfect figure to bear the brunt of the responsibility. What cemented her perception as a traitor is that she saved the Spaniards from an ambush by the Cholulans. She did this by sharing information given to her by the wife of a native leader. Malinche was offered safety if she went with them, but she decided to deliver the information to Cortés.
That led the Spanish conquistador to massacre the people of Cholula and march directly to the capital of the Aztec Empire. But was she really a traitor, or was she just doing what she was taught to do? Even if Malinche is recognized as an intelligent and resourceful woman, it’s important to keep in mind she was bred to obey.
Before she was gifted to Cortés, she had been a slave for years and from an early age. Betrayed by her own people and family, it’s easy to see how it became her nature to serve her master, whoever that may be. Does that mean that, in sharing that information, she wished for the Cholula massacre or the subsequent fall of the Aztec empire? The truth is, we can’t know her intentions for sure. The issue with that is no room has been left for interpretation because scholars, through the centuries, have negatively defined her intentions.
Was La Malinche Really a Traitor or Just a Woman Trying to Survive?
There’s no denying that La Malinche’s influence on Cortés was profound and she played a role in his success, gaining status herself. She helped Cortés form alliances and uncover plots, and she was also his consort. It’s also undeniable that there are no records regarding how she felt about the role she was forced to play.
She was easily written off as a traitor, but it’s not a matter of black and white. There are too many factors to consider about the complexity of her life. While some of her actions can be interpreted as treacherous, it’s important to remember that her negotiations saved her people from violence before the Cholula massacre, and the Aztecs respected her for that.
Despite her vilification, La Malinche’s legacy is a clear example of resilience, resistance, intelligence, and the transcending of simplistic narratives that have surrounded her story. She has immense significance in Latino history and more nuanced conversations about who she was have sprouted through the years.
La Malinche: A Misunderstood Icon
The life of La Malinche took place between two opposite sides of a global conflict. She was a trafficked girl and enslaved young woman who used the skills she had to survive. To discuss her story in black and white is a disservice to her and how women are defined in history - if they’re included at all.
Through a decolonized and feminist lens, it’s possible that she wasn’t just a temptress or a selfish traitor, but rather a complex woman who existed at a very complex time and who, like any other human, could have had both selfish and selfless virtues. What’s universally accepted, however, is that she was forced into a complicated role, and that complexity is what has enabled her to rise as an icon in history.
- 5 Latina Superheroes You Need To Know About ›
- You’re a Latina History Buff If You Do These 8 Things - Luz Media ›