Michelle González
Michelle González is a writer with over 7 years of experience working on topics such as lifestyle, culture, digital, and more - just a Latina who loves cats, good books, and contributing to important conversations about her community.
In The Community
Throughout history, some of the biggest changes in society have come from the ground up. Grassroots movements, driven by everyday people with a shared vision, have challenged injustice, demanded equality, and redefined the future. So let’s explore 5 grassroots movements that reshaped the world and continue to inspire action to this day:
The Civil Rights Movement
The American Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 60s is a great example of the power of grassroots activism in the fight for racial equality. Faced with entrenched segregation and systemic racism, African Americans and their allies took to the streets, organizing sit-ins, boycotts, and marches that shook the nation’s conscience. Led by figures like Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, and countless local activists, the movement forced the United States to confront its deep-seated racial inequalities.
Their persistence paid off with landmark victories such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed discrimination based on race, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which protected African Americans' right to vote. The movement's influence transformed American society and inspired human rights struggles across the globe, proving that collective action could dismantle even the most oppressive systems.
The Women's Suffrage Movement
The fight for women’s right to vote wasn’t won overnight. It was a decades-long struggle fueled by determined grassroots activists who refused to be silenced. In the United States, the movement gained momentum in the mid-19th century with leaders like Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton rallying for equal rights. Women organized conventions, circulated petitions, and engaged in acts of civil disobedience to demand their place in the democratic process.
Their relentless efforts culminated in the ratification of the 19th Amendment in 1920, finally granting women the right to vote. The impact of this victory paved the way for future generations of women to push for broader gender equality in the workplace, education, and politics.
The Anti-Apartheid Movement
Few movements demonstrate the power of global grassroots activism quite like the fight against apartheid in South Africa. For decades, Black South Africans faced institutionalized racial segregation under a brutal system that denied them basic rights. But resistance was relentless, both within the country and abroad. Inside South Africa, activists like Nelson Mandela and Desmond Tutu led protests, strikes, and acts of civil disobedience, despite facing violent repression.
Internationally, people around the world rallied to the cause through boycotts, sanctions, and divestment campaigns targeting companies that did business with the apartheid regime. The movement’s unwavering pressure ultimately led to the collapse of apartheid in the early 1990s, culminating in Mandela’s election as the country’s first Black president in 1994.
The Environmental Movement
What started as a series of small grassroots efforts to protect local ecosystems has grown into a global movement advocating for the planet’s survival. The environmental movement took off in the 1960s and 70s, sparked by growing concerns about pollution, deforestation, and climate change. Activists raised awareness through initiatives like the first Earth Day in 1970, which galvanized millions of people worldwide to demand action.
Their advocacy led to the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the U.S. and landmark legislation such as the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act. Over time, the movement expanded to address issues like climate change, renewable energy, and environmental justice. Thanks to grassroots pressure, corporations and governments alike have been forced to take sustainability seriously.
The LGBTQ+ Rights Movement
For decades, LGBTQ+ individuals have faced discrimination, legal persecution, and societal exclusion. But grassroots activism helped turn the tide, starting with the Stonewall Riots of 1969, a pivotal moment when LGBTQ+ individuals fought back against police harassment in New York City. This uprising sparked a global movement that fought for visibility, acceptance, and equal rights.
Over the years, activists have worked tirelessly to decriminalize homosexuality, secure workplace protections, and achieve the right to marry in many countries around the world. The progress has been undeniable, with pride parades, advocacy organizations, and legal victories marking significant milestones. However, the fight continues as the movement pushes for broader acceptance and protections against discrimination.
- The LGBTQ+ Paradox: Progress Amongst Increasing Homophobic and Transphobic Violence in the Latino Community ›
- Celebrating Dolores Huerta’s Lifetime of Advocacy on her 94th Birthday ›
The U.S. Congress passed the Laken Riley Act, a sweeping immigration enforcement bill named after a Georgia nursing student whose tragic death became a flashpoint in the national immigration debate. The bill, which received support from 12 of the 47 Democrats in the U.S. Senate, joined Republicans in backing the bill, marking a significant shift from previous immigration discussions led by Democrats. The bill now awaits President Donald Trump's signature and is expected to be the first major legislation signed into law during his second term.
On January 22, 2025, the House of Representatives approved the final version of the bill by a vote of 263-156. This followed the Senate's passage earlier in the week, where the legislation garnered a 64-35 majority. Forty-six Democrats in the House also crossed party lines to back the bill.
What Does the Laken Riley Act Authorize?
The Laken Riley Act introduces a comprehensive overhaul of immigration enforcement policy, significantly expanding the scope of federal and state authority while broadening the circumstances under which undocumented immigrants can face detention and deportation. These changes have far-reaching implications for individuals, state governments, and international relations.
Expanded Scope of Detention
One of the most controversial aspects of the bill is mandatory detention. The law requires that undocumented immigrants be detained not only if they’re convicted of specific crimes but also if they’re arrested or charged, even in cases where no conviction occurs. This marks a substantial departure from previous policies, where enforcement often focused on individuals with significant criminal convictions.
The act targets a range of offenses, including burglary, theft, larceny, shoplifting, assault on law enforcement officers, and any crimes resulting in death or serious bodily injury. By expanding the criteria to include minor crimes like shoplifting, the law casts a wide net, capturing individuals who may not pose significant public safety risks.
Critics have raised concerns that this could strain resources, particularly detention facilities, and result in unintended consequences for individuals and families caught in the system. A recent Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo estimated the need for new jail beds to be over 100,000 and the costs of enforcement of the new law to be over $26 billion.
State Authority and Legal Actions
The Laken Riley Act grants state attorneys general significant new authority to sue the federal government over perceived failures in immigration enforcement, including actions related to detention, deportation, and visa policies. This shift decentralizes immigration enforcement, potentially leading to inconsistent application across states.
Additionally, the bill allows states to compel visa sanctions on countries that don’t cooperate with deportations and removes such cases from the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, transferring them to local district courts. These changes are expected to increase localized legal disputes, adding complexity to the enforcement process.
Visa Sanctions and International Implications
The Laken Riley Act also introduces mechanisms for imposing court-ordered visa restrictions on countries that fail to accept deported nationals in a timely manner. These visa sanctions apply to both immigrant and nonimmigrant visas, potentially limiting travel and economic exchanges with affected countries.
The bill also enables state officials to seek court orders for the deportation of specific individuals, bypassing the need for approval from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Critics argue that this creates a decentralized approach to immigration enforcement that may lead to inconsistencies in its application.
Challenges to Implementation
While the bill marks a significant legislative milestone, its implementation faces substantial obstacles. The t extraordinarily high estimated cost of approximately $26.9 billion in its first year alone is largely due to the need to expand detention capacity to 151,500 beds—up from the current 41,500. However, the bill doesn’t allocate additional funding for these requirements, raising concerns about how federal agencies will meet the new mandates.
Another potential hurdle lies in the legal challenges the bill is likely to face. The expanded powers granted to states, particularly the ability to sue the federal government over immigration policy, may prompt constitutional scrutiny. Critics argue that this provision could lead to a flood of lawsuits, complicating the enforcement of immigration laws and overburdening federal courts.
Mexico’s Response to U.S. Policy Changes
The passage of the Laken Riley Act coincides with a series of executive orders issued by Donald Trump. Together, these legislative and executive actions are being presented as an effort to tighten immigration enforcement and strengthen border security. In response to these significant shifts in U.S. immigration policy, including reinstating the "Remain in Mexico" policy, suspending the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program, and enhancing vetting processes for visa applicants, Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum has taken a more balanced approach, emphasizing national sovereignty while addressing the humanitarian challenges posed by potential mass deportations.
Sheinbaum has stated that Mexico has its "own migratory policies" and will engage in dialogue with U.S. agencies to manage the evolving situation. At the same time, the Mexican government has launched the "Mexico Embraces You" program to support returning deportees. This initiative includes setting up reception centers at border crossings, providing debit cards with 2,000 pesos (approximately $98) for transportation, and offering priority access to work programs, social security, and welfare services.
Additionally, Sheinbaum has committed to a humanitarian approach, particularly for those stranded in cold conditions along the border. While Mexico may accept deportees beyond its own citizens temporarily, it plans to facilitate the voluntary repatriation of non-Mexican nationals to their home countries in compliance with the country’s migration policy.
Next Steps for the Laken Riley Act and Broader Implications
President Trump is expected to sign the bill into law in the coming days. Once enacted, federal agencies, particularly ICE, will need to quickly develop plans to implement the new requirements. This will likely involve hiring additional personnel, building or expanding detention facilities, and coordinating with state and local governments.
Congressional Republicans, meanwhile, are strategizing on how to secure funding for the bill's implementation and the broader immigration priorities of the Trump administration. This may involve budget reconciliation measures or additional legislative proposals in the months ahead.
The passage of the Laken Riley Act represents one of the most expansive shifts in U.S. immigration enforcement policy in recent decades, with far-reaching implications for law enforcement, immigrant communities, the national budget, and the broader political landscape. As the legislation moves toward implementation, debates over its practical, legal, and ethical ramifications are expected to intensify in the coming months.
In his first days as President, Donald Trump’s administration has already implemented significant changes to U.S. immigration policies, with heightened enforcement activities creating uncertainty for immigrant communities across the nation. The administration has indicated plans for increased immigration raids and a tougher stance on undocumented immigrants, focusing on sanctuary cities and areas historically protected from enforcement actions.
Trump’s Policy Changes and Enforcement Priorities
Since taking office on January 20, 2025, President Trump has signed several executive orders aimed at intensifying immigration enforcement. Key changes include rescinding policies that restricted Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations near sensitive locations such as schools, hospitals, and houses of worship. ICE agents now have greater freedom to conduct enforcement actions in these areas.
Additionally, Trump has issued an executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship for children born to non-citizens and non-permanent residents in the United States, effective February 19, 2025 (though legal experts have said that the President does not have the authority to amend the constitution by executive order). Expedited removal procedures, previously limited to those apprehended within 100 miles of U.S. borders, have been expanded nationwide. This order expands fast-track deportations nationwide and applies to immigrants who can't prove two years of continuous U.S. residence, allowing ICE to deport more people without hearings.
The administration has also reinstated the "Remain in Mexico" policy, requiring asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while their cases are processed in the United States. This policy has drawn criticism from immigrant rights advocates and created logistical challenges for migrants seeking safety.
Although large-scale raids have not yet occurred, officials have indicated plans to target major metropolitan areas, including Los Angeles, Chicago, New York, Denver, and Washington, D.C. These operations are expected to include workplace raids and targeted enforcement actions in sanctuary jurisdictions.
Some small-scale raids have already taken place. From January 9 to January 11, 2025, Border Patrol agents conducted a series of raids in Kern County, California, near Bakersfield. This operation, dubbed "Operation Return to Sender," resulted in 78 arrests of undocumented individuals, some with prior criminal records. The United Farm Workers union estimates the actual number of arrests may be closer to 200.
ICE teams have also been conducting routine enforcement operations across the country, arresting individuals deemed threats to public safety and national security. Under the new administration's policies, ICE agents now have greater discretion in their actions, including the ability to make "collateral arrests" of undocumented individuals encountered during operations who may not have been the primary targets.
The new policies have significantly heightened fear and uncertainty among immigrant communities. Families are questioning whether it’s safe to send children to school, seek medical care, or access other essential services. The prospect of increased enforcement actions has prompted many immigrants to avoid public spaces, limit their travel, and take precautions to minimize interactions with authorities.
What to Do if Approached by Immigration Officials
Immigrants, regardless of status, have certain constitutional rights that they can exercise when interacting with law enforcement, including ICE agents. Legal experts have circulated guidance:
- Remain Calm and Silent
Immigrants have the right to remain silent and should avoid answering questions about their immigration status. Running or resisting could escalate the situation.
- Refuse Searches Without a Warrant
Immigration officials cannot enter homes or search personal property without a valid judicial warrant. Immigrants should request to see the warrant before complying.
- Avoid Signing Documents
Do not sign any paperwork without consulting a lawyer. Documents may waive important rights or lead to expedited deportation.
- Ask to Speak to an Attorney
Immigrants have the right to legal representation, even if they cannot afford an attorney. They should explicitly request a lawyer during interactions with authorities.
- Document the Encounter
If possible, take note of badge numbers, names, and details of the interaction.
If ICE agents arrive at a home, residents aren’t required to open the door unless agents present a valid warrant. It’s advisable to ask officials to slide the warrant under the door to verify its legitimacy. If agents enter without permission, residents should state clearly that they don’t consent to the search.
Immigrants working in the United States, including undocumented workers, have rights that protect them from discrimination and exploitation. They’re entitled to minimum wage, overtime pay, and workplace safety protections. During workplace raids, employees should avoid signing documents or providing statements without legal counsel.
Several organizations provide resources and assistance to immigrants navigating these challenges. These include the National Immigration Law Center, the American Civil Liberties Union, and local immigrant rights groups. Many organizations distribute "Know Your Rights" cards that immigrants can carry to help assert their rights during encounters with law enforcement.
How to Prepare for Potential Raids
To prepare for potential enforcement actions, immigration advocates encourage the development of a family preparedness plan, which includes:
- Memorizing important phone numbers. Including those of trusted family or friends, and immigration lawyers or legal aid organizations.
- Keeping essential documents, such as birth certificates, passports, visas, financial documents, and medical records, in a secure and accessible location. It’s also recommended to create copies and store them with a trusted person or digitally.
- Designating a trusted individual to care for children in case of detention.
For those with children, they recommend:
- Designate a trusted individual with legal status who can care for your children in case of detention.
- Establish a power of attorney that authorizes the caregiver to make decisions on your behalf.
- Prepare an emergency contact card for your children with names, addresses, and phone numbers of trusted adults.
While legal experts and advocates circulate guidance, it’s not legal advice and a qualified attorney should always be consulted in each individual’s circumstance.
The Trump administration’s recent policy changes have created a complex and uncertain environment for immigrants in the United States. Immigrants and undocumented people can protect themselves by understanding their rights, staying informed through trusted sources, and seeking legal assistance when needed.
These leading organizations are reliable places to start when seeking information and legal resources:
- American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA)
- Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC)
- National Immigration Law Center (NILC)
- United We Dream
- National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC)
- Immigrant Defense Project
- National Immigration Forum
- Immigration Advocates Network (IAN)
- U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants (USCRI)
- Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF)
- The Hispanic Federation
- League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC)
- Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA)
- American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
- “No Sabo” is a Slur, Fight Me On It ›
- Unpacking the Birthright Debate: Is Citizenship by Birth Under Threat? ›