“Old Money” vs. “New Money:” How Class Wars Reinforce Racial Inequality

 woman standing on a skyscraper terrace, gazing at the tall buildings surrounding her in the city.

The terms "old money" and "new money" aren’t new. At first glance, they’re just an observational comment on the accumulation of wealth. But if you look deeper, the implications are a lot more complex than that. “Old money” and “new money” actually reflect the ongoing class wars that reinforce racial inequality in this capitalistic society we inhabit. But how do these terms intersect with systemic racism and racial hierarchies, exactly?


@couturechic

Old Money✨⚜️ >> #oldmoney #vs #newmoney #oldmoneyaesthetic #oldmoneylifestyle #money #rich #fyp #viral #xyzbca


What Is "Old Money" vs. "New Money"

Before diving into the crux of the issue, it's essential to understand the underlying connotations both of these terms carry. "Old money" typically refers to families or individuals who have maintained their wealth over several generations. These families often pride themselves on traditions, lineage, and sometimes even blue-blooded ancestry. In contrast, the term "new money" is used to describe people or families who've acquired wealth in their lifetime, often through innovation, entrepreneurship, or sudden fame.

The problem isn't the definitions but the values and assumptions attached to them.

The vast majority of "old money" families are white and that’s due to the historical advantages and opportunities afforded to them, often at the disproportionate expense and exclusion of people of color. Considering the U.S. context, centuries of systemic racism - from slavery, Jim Crow laws, to discriminatory lending practices - have actively kept Black, Latino, and other communities of color from accumulating generational wealth. By venerating "old money" and its associated sophistication or class, we inadvertently celebrate a system that thrived on racial inequality.

The dichotomy often casts "new money" as flashy, ostentatious, or lacking in class. This not only undermines the hard work, innovation, and resilience of "new money" individuals but also disproportionately impacts people of color, who, due to systemic barriers, are more often in the "new money" category.

How Do These Terms Reinforce Racial Inequality

The terms "old money" and "new money" reinforce racial stereotypes precisely because of the images they invoke and the underlying assumptions they reinforce. "Old money" often brings to mind generations of wealthy, white families who have inherited their wealth, living in grand mansions and belonging to exclusive social circles. This image suggests a sense of tradition, stability, and entitlement to wealth.

On the other hand, "new money" typically conjures up images of flashy, self-made people—such as tech moguls, entertainers, sports stars, and entrepreneurs—who have recently acquired wealth. They’re often outsiders to the traditional elite and many of them are people of color.

This contrast subtly implies that wealth for people of color is something new, temporary, or obtained through unconventional means or sheer luck. It reinforces the idea that true, lasting wealth belongs to the white elite, and creates a distinction about who truly “deserves” wealth depending on how it’s acquired and the color of their skin.

Language is powerful. The way we name and categorize things can shape perceptions, influence opinions, and even determine value systems. By perpetuating the "old money" vs. "new money" narrative without a second thought, we’re endorsing the racial biases they carry.

We can choose to celebrate new beginnings, innovation, persistence, determination, and diverse paths to success. We can recognize that wealth accumulated without the shadow of oppression has its unique value. And most importantly, we can remember that in the age of information, the stories we amplify and the names we give to things can either perpetuate systemic racism or challenge and change it.

In this digital age, we have the power to rewrite narratives.

Protestors at women's march stand behing a banner that reads "we are still the resistance"
Photo Courtesy of the Women's March

On January 18, 2025, Washington, D.C., will once again become a hub of public dissent with The People’s March, hosted by Women’s March. This demonstration comes at a historic moment, just days before Donald Trump begins his second term as president. Framed as a collective stand against policies that organizers see as harmful to equality and justice, the march aims to unite voices from across the nation in an act of resistance and hope.

Keep ReadingShow less
image of devastating fires in Los Angeles area

Last updated: January 13, 9:07 a.m. PT.

Multiple wildfires are currently tearing through Los Angeles County, forcing hundreds of thousands to flee. The fires have now claimed 10 lives. While the Palisades fire captured widespread media attention due to its location in the affluent Pacific Palisades neighborhood, at the time of this reporting, the Eaton Fire quickly grew to the same devastating size as the Palisades and took entire neighborhoods with it. The Eaton fire is still currently impacting areas with a significant Latino population, such as Altadena, where 27.2% of the population is Latino according to the latest census.

Keep ReadingShow less
golden globes 2025 nominees
Created by Luz Media

This year’s Golden Globe Awards had one of the highest number of Latino nominees in its history. While that’s a milestone worth celebrating, the actual outcome of the ceremony is a reminder of how far Hollywood still has to go. Out of all the groundbreaking nominees, including 8 Latine actors and at least 9 projects with significant Latino involvement behind the scenes (including 4 Latine directors), only 2 Latina actresses, Dominican-Puerto Rican Zoe Saldaña and Brazilian Fernanda Torres, walked away with trophies. Their wins are historic and well-deserved, but they don’t hide the fact that Latino talent continues to be largely overlooked in an industry that thrives on Latine contributions both on and off the screen.

Keep ReadingShow less