Instagram Quietly Limited Users’ Ability to See “Political” Content

Graphic design showing the Instagram interface and its new automation of limiting political content

Yes, Your Setting Was Changed Too

Luz Media

Update: This article was updated on June 26, 2024, to include additional details about issues Instagram users have with the political content settings reverting to their default limitations.

On February 9th, 2024, Instagram chief Adam Mosseri quietly announced through a thread post that Instagram and Threads would be moving away from actively recommending political content. Mosseri shared that the platforms would be transitioning towards a new system where political content would become opt-in by default. Meta defined political content as “content [that] is likely to mention governments, elections, or social topics that affect a group of people and/or society at large.”


With such a broad definition, users who want to continue seeing anything deemed “political” in their feeds would have to adjust their settings accordingly.

Users can still follow profiles they prefer, but Meta's algorithms will limit the exposure of political content from profiles the user doesn’t follow unless users manually enable the “Don’t limit” option in their preferences. Despite Mosseri specifying "accounts" in the announcement, the limitation will only apply to political content that would appear in suggested content areas like the explore tab, reels, and suggested users. Overall, users weren’t happy.

User @bevdid expresses her opinion on Threads platformComment by @bevdid on Threads


User @rafacst expresses his opinion on Threads platformComment by @rafacst on Threads

This is a reflection of Meta’s overall goal of prioritizing entertaining content over news. This shift has been quietly in the works for a while, with Mark Zuckerberg making his intentions clear in an interview with The Verge back in 2023. While this change to Instagram and Threads allegedly seeks to make interactions less divisive, it severely affects every personal or media account that shares political content and news, effectively limiting their reach.

For creators who share this type of content to raise awareness, advocate for social issues, inform and educate, and drive social action, this creates a big hurdle in reaching a wider audience outside their follower base.

Despite the announcement that the changes would be rolled out over time, the public hasn’t exactly been kept in the loop. As it turns out, the opt-in feature has already been launched and the default setting is set to “limit” political content. In other words, all Instagram accounts have been converted to the new setting, and users are using their accounts without many knowing their content is now limited.

"Content Preferences" interface on Instagram

To find the feature and disable it, users have to:

  1. Go to their profile using the iOS or Android app.
  2. Tap more options in the top right, which is the icon with the three horizontal lines.
  3. Scroll down and tap “Suggested content.”
  4. Tap “Political content” and then check the “Don’t limit” box so they “might see more political or social topics” in their suggested content

Image shared by user @ykreborn on Instagram

The feature isn’t easy to find. Even after following the above directions, several Luz staff members had to use the search function, using “suggested content,” to finally find the setting.

In recent developments, Instagram users are reporting that their political content settings are reverting back to their default state even after disabling them. Some users report that the settings switch from "Don't limit political content from people you don't follow" to "Limit political content from people you don't follow" immediately after closing the Instagram app and opening it back up. Other users report that their settings switch to the default "Limit political content from people you don't follow" at an unspecified point in time after they disable the feature. In other words, users have to constantly adjust their political content settings to reflect their preferences.

The political content policy doesn't state that the disabling of political content limitations is temporary, so users are at a loss as to why their settings keep reverting to the default option. As of June 26, 2024, neither Instagram nor Meta have released a statement about this issue or any statement regarding an update to their policies for political content. As part of our commitment to providing accurate and comprehensive information, Luz Media has reached out to Instagram's press inquiry department. At the time of this update, we haven't received a response yet.

While on the subject of content settings, it’s also important to be aware of Instagram’s Fact-Checked Control. The platform claims a commitment to reducing the spread of false information by using third-party fact-checkers or their own technology to identify and mark false information. When false information is found, the algorithm makes it harder for people to see.

Users have control over how fact-checked content appears in their feed from the creators they follow. Fact-Checked Control is set to “Reduce” by default, which means content considered false or altered will be shown less. This limits content reach even further. To change this setting and have greater access to content, users have to go into their settings, tap “Content preferences,” and then select the level of fact-checking they want. By selecting “Don’t reduce,” no content will be moved lower in the feed, allowing users to see all content.

"Content Preferences" interface on Instagram

Reportedly, the “Content preferences” option is not available to everyone, not even if searched within Instagram’s settings. Some users say they’re able to find the setting for political content limitation, but not the setting for fact-checking, while others do have access to both. Users are encouraged to explore their settings thoroughly and decide what kind of content they want on their feed, rather than have Meta decide for them.


Update Details: On June 26, 2024, we included a new section on the reported issues Instagram users have with their political content settings reverting to the default "Limit political content from people you don't follow" even after disabling it.

This Viral Video Game Is Changing the Face of Voter Outreach

In 2024, voting campaigns have evolved greatly, to say the least. Creativity is now the name of the game and tongue-in-cheek humor is expertly leveraged to drive action. One example of that is Bop the Bigot, a revival of a viral game created in 2016 by Bazta Arpaio, an Arizona activist group, as part of a campaign to unseat Maricopa County’s Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Arpaio lost his re-election to Paul Penzone that year.

The game has now been updated for the current election cycle and relaunched by On Point Studios, with new features added to enable players to find out what’s on their ballot, confirm voter status, and register to vote.

Much like its former 2016 version, the game allows users to take out their political frustrations by virtually “bopping” GOP candidates in the head. It’s very similar to whack-a-mole, except the mole is replaced by former President Donald Trump, Ohio’s Senator J. D. Vance, and Kevin Roberts, President of the Heritage Foundation, which is spearheading Project 2025.

cartoon renditions of Donald Trump and J.D. Vance around a Bop the Bigot logoPromotional image provided by On Point Studios.

B. Loewe, Director of On Point Studios, came up with the concept for this game when working as the Communications Director at Bazta Arpaio in 2016, and is the executive producer of this revamped version. In the first version of the game, Bop the Bigot players used a chancla (flip flop) to “bop” the characters, tapping into Latino culture by leaning on the childhood experience of being set right by a flying chancla from a fed-up mother or grandmother.

This year, the chancla is replaced by a more current element, a green coconut, referencing Kamala Harris’ coconut tree meme. There are also side characters like “the couch,” cat ladies, and more coconuts. All references to jokes about Vice-Presidential candidate Vance, or insults Vance has made about women on the campaign trail.

Another new addition is that Harris’ laugh is immortalized as the game-over sound effect, an unexpected detail that adds even more humor and levity to the game.

cartoon renditions of Donald Trump, Kevin Roberts, and J.D. Vance around a Bop the Bigot logoPromotional image provided by On Point Studios.

Bop the Bigot, which is playable on desktop and mobile, is intended not just as a way to vent political frustrations, but also as a tool for activism and securing voter engagement.

For example, the game supports the work of Mexican Neidi Dominguez Zamorano, Founding Executive Director of the non-profit organization Organized Power in Numbers by using the “game over” screen to prompt players to donate to it and support their efforts.

Organized Power in Numbers is focused on empowering workers in the South and Southwest of the U.S. through collective action and comprehensive campaigns. Their mission is to create a large-scale movement that challenges the status quo and advocates for workers' rights, and racial and economic justice.

Currently, Dominguez Zamorano is leading worker outreach to 2 million working-class voters in the South and Southwest through doorknocking, texting, and calls with the help of local groups in North Carolina, Arizona, New Mexico, and more.

“We have been blown away by the enthusiastic reception for the video game. We knew we wanted to be part of its creative approach because our movement needs more fun and laughter. We need more ways to connect with nuestra gente so we can feel joy among all the absurdity we witness every day,” Dominguez Zamorano shared with Luz Media via email.

“Our people are gente trabajadora and we deserve to feel uplifted even in our toughest moments. We are deeply involved in the South and Southwest so we know what’s at stake in this election and we’re happy this can be a resource to mobilize, raise spirits, and get out the vote," she concluded.

Dominguez Zamorano is a committed activist for immigrants and workers' rights, known for her strategist skills and expertise. She played a key role in the campaign to win DACA and has also held roles in major campaigns, including as Deputy National States Director for Bernie Sanders' 2020 presidential campaign. In addition to her work with Organized Power in Numbers, Dominguez Zamorano is serving as a Senior Advisor to Mijente’s Fuera Trump Initiative.

Grassroots efforts like these have taken on new life in 2024, with Bop the Bigot adding to the larger, ongoing fight against political apathy and disinformation. Just as it did during the 2016 race, the video game uses humor to soften the serious task at hand—getting people to the polls.

"We want the game to be a fun and comical outlet for anyone who’s been insulted, frustrated, or harmed by Trump in the past and everyone who is ready to move forward as a country after election day," explained Loewe in a press release. "The proposals in Project 2025 and the beliefs of Trump and Vance aren’t just weird, they’re truly harmful. We wanted to give people a humorous and peaceful way to smack down their racism and sexism. We hope it makes people laugh and also feel empowered and motivated to get to the polls on or before election day."

With a mix of satire, sharp political critique, and nostalgia, the game is a call to action. The upcoming election, which is getting closer by the minute, has sparked fierce activism and creative yet grounded initiatives like these aim to ensure voters are engaged, especially young Latinos and disenfranchised groups.

hands holding up yellow protest signs that say Hands Off Our Bodies
Photo Credit: Gayatri Malhotra via Unsplash

Originally published in Common Dreams. Reprinted with permission.

The Latino electorate will prove decisive in securing reproductive freedom and abortion access through ballot measures around the country, particularly in states where Latinos are a significant portion of the electorate.

In November, abortion rights measures will appear on ballots across ten states, including Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Nevada, and New York, where Latinos make up a significant portion of the electorate. For decades, pundits and politicians have recycled long-held misconceptions about Latino voters and abortion access, citing our conservative and religious beliefs.

Anti-abortion extremists have long fueled these misconceptions through misinformation and disinformation campaigns targeting Latino communities with egregious lies and inflammatory rhetoric about abortion. Yet, polling, focus groups, and direct interactions with Latino communities have debunked these outdated tropes.

The Latino electorate will prove decisive in securing reproductive freedom and abortion access through ballot measures around the country, particularly in states where Latinos are a significant portion of the electorate.

For Latinos, the freedom to decide, a pillar of our American democracy, is critical. Meanwhile, Latinos are being hit directly with anti-abortion efforts that take away that freedom such as the six-week abortion ban put into effect by the Florida Supreme Court and the 1864 abortion ban upheld by the Arizona Supreme Court. In the wake of the Dobbs decision, people of color and Latinas have felt the impact of a lack of abortion access, an element of basic healthcare.

A 2023 report by the National Partnership for Women and Families estimated that nearly 6.5 million Latinas, or 42% of all Latinas of reproductive age in the country, live in a state that either had or was likely to ban abortion. Ironically, it will be abortion access and anti-choice efforts to restrict freedom of choice that will mobilize Latino voters this election.

In a poll conducted by three national reproductive justice organizations, 87% of Latinas named abortion and women’s rights as one of their top priorities as they head to the polls. Another battleground poll conducted by Somos PAC and BSP Research found that 61% of Latino registered voters expressed a more positive/favorable view of Kamala Harris after hearing that she will protect abortion rights, versus only 19% of Latinos who said they had a more negative view of Harris after hearing that.

In key states to secure the White House and both chambers, Latinos make up large chunks of the electorate: Arizona (25%), Colorado (15%), Florida (20%), Nevada (20%), and New York (12%). In the face of unprecedented attacks on basic healthcare access and targeted attempts by extremists to mislead and divide our community on this issue, this November Latinos will be key deciders on abortion access across the country.

Mari Urbina, Managing Director of Indivisible, Battleground Arizona Lead and former Harry Reid advisor.

Héctor Sánchez Barba is president and CEO of Mi Familia Vota (MFV).