From Puerto Rico's Trials to Over-the-Counter Access: The Evolution of the Birth Control Pill

a black and white photograph of a village in Puerto Rico with kids playing and adults watching over them

In light of recent events where the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) greenlit the sale of Opill, a birth control pill, without the need for a prescription, the conversation about contraceptives and women's reproductive rights is once again at the forefront.

This monumental decision marks the first time consumers in the U.S. will be able to access a daily oral contraceptive over the counter without a prescription. Patrizia Cavazzoni, the director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, emphasizes that this move aims to make contraception more effective and accessible.

But as we celebrate this progress, it’s important to remember the role women of color played in the development of the contraceptive pill and other reproductive medicine advancements. From experiments on enslaved Black women to, in this case, impoverished women in Puerto Rico, the amount of women who served as sacrificial guinea pigs shouldn't be lost in the untold abyss of intentional historical erasure.

Puerto Rico, during the 1950s, was in the midst of dramatic changes. Urbanization was on the rise, and there was an aggressive push to reduce the island's high birth rate. This provided an ideal setting for American pharmaceutical companies and researchers to test their new invention—the birth control pill.

The starting point was the collaboration between Gregory Pincus, an American biologist, and Dr. John Rock, a gynecologist. Margaret Sanger, a well-known champion of birth control who also believed in white supremacist eugenics theory, was also involved in the planning. They were on a mission to create a birth control pill, but to get FDA approval, they needed large-scale human trials, and experimenting on white women was entirely unacceptable.

They looked towards Puerto Rico, mainly due to the ease of bypassing stringent testing requirements and the island's lack of regulatory protections. The U.S. had significant influence over the island, allowing for easier navigation of bureaucratic red tape. Plus, many women on the island had limited access to medical care, making them more persuadable to participate in clinical trials.

Additionally, the predominantly Catholic Puerto Rican populace had been resistant to sterilization campaigns earlier in the decade. This gave researchers a large pool of women who could potentially benefit from a non-permanent form of birth control and local non-religious leaders were on board with this.

Women in areas like Rio Piedras and Humacao were given the pill, often without full understanding or consent. They were told it was a new form of contraceptive, but the potential risks or the experimental nature of the medication were conveniently omitted.

The high hormone dosages in these early pills led to alarming side effects. Women experienced discomforting symptoms ranging from nausea and dizziness to severe consequences like blood clots and heart issues. Tragically, some even lost their lives. Yet, these repercussions were often dismissed or downplayed by the researchers. In their quest for FDA approval, the lives of these Puerto Rican women were necessary and meaningless casualties.

Deep-rooted machismo and misogyny also played its part. Women's health was secondary to the societal expectation of them as the principal agents of family planning. The trials were emblematic of this skewed perspective, putting women at risk, while the responsibility of men in family planning was sidelined.

While the trials in Puerto Rico did pave the way for the FDA's approval of the contraceptive pill in 1960, the cost at which this came remains a dark shadow. The lessons here extend beyond the importance of informed consent; they underscore the need for a holistic approach to women's health, respecting our rights, voices, and well-being.

As we embrace these new strides, with birth control pills like Opill being touted as “affordable” and “easy to obtain,” it's a stark reminder of how far we've come from the days of the Puerto Rican trials. The journey, from ethical breaches in research to a world where over 100 countries offer birth control over the counter, underscores the importance of vigilance, respect, and commitment to women's rights and health.

In our modern context, with professionals like Melissa Chen from the UC Davis Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology highlighting the convenience of such over-the-counter options, especially for those struggling to get clinic appointments, we're witnessing an era where access to contraception is becoming culturally accepted.

Yet, as we stand on the brink of this new age of contraceptive access, let's not forget the sacrifices and trials of the women of Puerto Rico. Their stories aren’t just about the past but serve as a rallying cry for the future—a future where medical ethics and women's rights go hand in hand.

A Latina woman in full color, set against a background showcasing a collection of wedding dresses, evoking a sense of the past.

In the United States, societal attitudes toward marriage are evolving, evidenced by a significant decrease in marriage rates – dropping from a robust 76.5% in 1970 to a modest 31% today – this trend spans various communities, including the Latino community, which is actively challenging conventional norms, reshaping roles, and forging new paths in their conceptions of love and family.

Keep ReadingShow less
a Latina woman skillfully juggling the demands of family and work life.

Despite Latinas in the U.S. leading the charge as the fastest-growing group of entrepreneurs in 2023 and despite the rise of Bachelor’s Degree attainment among them, Latinas continue to feel the pressure of gender role expectations often imposed within Latino culture. A recent Pew Research Center study has shed light on just how much pressure Latinas in America are under.

Keep ReadingShow less