In The Community
The landscape of abortion rights in the United States has become more restrictive than ever in recent history, particularly in Arizona and Florida, where recent developments represent a major setback for women’s reproductive rights. On April 9, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled in a 4-to-2 decision to uphold an 1864 law banning abortion from the moment of conception. The only exception is saving the mother’s life, but there are no exceptions for rape or incest under this law.
Just a few days earlier, on April 1, the Florida Supreme Court also ruled in favor of upholding a 6-week abortion ban, which will take effect on May 1. This further reduced the legal threshold for abortions in Florida, which used to be 24 weeks of pregnancy before Republicans passed a law in 2022 banning abortions after 15 weeks. Both of these rulings have sparked intense debate and outrage about their impact on women’s rights.
Overview of the Near-Total Abortion Ban in Arizona
Medical professionals have spoken out about how dire the situation will become for women with this near-total abortion ban. Dr. Jill Gibson, chief medical director of Planned Parenthood in Arizona, told CNN that this ruling will have “absolutely unbelievable consequences for the patients in our community.” She continued by saying, “Providers need to be able to take care of their patients without fear of legal repercussions and criminalization.”
Representatives from Arizona and other states across the country have also spoken up against this near-total abortion ban.
Video by Shontel Brown Member of the United States House of Representatives on InstagramVideo by Shontel Brown Member of the United States House of Representatives on Instagram
Image by Rubén Gallego Member of the United States House of Representatives on InstagramImage by Rubén Gallego Member of the United States House of Representatives on Instagram
Until this Arizona Supreme Court decision, abortion had been legal in the state up to 15 weeks of pregnancy. The right to abortion via Roe v. Wade prevented the enforcement of the near-total abortion ban, but since a majority vote in the Supreme Court of the United States overturned Roe, those opposed to abortion rights had been fighting to enforce the 160-year-old 1864 law.
This new abortion ban in Arizona is not effective immediately as the court has paused its ruling for 14 days until additional arguments are heard in a lower court about how constitutional the law is. However, the law will likely come into effect in May, a few weeks from now. Planned Parenthood Arizona, the largest abortion provider in the state, will continue serving the community until the ban is enforced.
An Overview of Florida's Six-Week Abortion Ban
The landscape of abortion in Florida has also undergone a significant change with the enforcement of a 6-week abortion ban, replacing the previous 15-week limit. This ban, similar to Arizona's, severely restricts access to abortion care and poses a significant challenge to reproductive rights in the state. Providers are bracing for a public health crisis due to the increased demand for abortion and limited options for patients.
Practically speaking, a 6-week abortion ban is a near-total abortion ban because pregnant people often don’t even realize they could be pregnant by this early stage. Combined with Florida’s strict abortion requirements, which include mandatory in-person doctor visits with a 24-hour waiting period, it’s nearly impossible for those who may want an abortion to be able to access it before 6 weeks. Not to mention that fulfilling the requirements is particularly challenging for low-income individuals.
Video by theluncheonlawyer on InstagramVideo by theluncheonlawyer on Instagram
Moreover, this Florida law also restricts telemedicine for abortion and requires that medication be provided in person, effectively eliminating mail-order options for abortion pills. While exceptions for rape and incest exist in Florida, the requirements are also strict, asking victims to provide police records or medical records. For victims who don’t always report sexual violence for many different reasons, these exceptions don’t make a difference.
The consequences of Florida’s ban extend to neighboring states with more restrictive abortion laws. For instance, residents of Alabama, facing a total ban on abortion, and Georgia, with its own 6-week abortion ban, have relied on Florida for abortion services. That will no longer be an option, further limiting care alternatives.
The Road Ahead
These recent abortion bans in Arizona and Florida are a major setback for women's rights, particularly impacting Latina women who already face barriers to accessing quality healthcare. These bans not only restrict women’s reproductive freedom but also endanger their lives.
Efforts to challenge these bans through legal means and ballot measures are ongoing, but the road ahead is uncertain. While there’s hope for overturning these abortion bans, the challenges of conservative laws and legal battles are formidable. The November ballot in both states will be crucial in determining the future of abortion rights and access for all.
- Adilka Féliz: The Dominican Republic's Total Abortion Ban Takes Another Innocent Life ›
- Latin-American 'Green Wave' Gains Momentum Amongst Worsening U.S. Conditions for Abortion Access ›
- Texas Abortion Laws Cause Horrific Impact on Latinas: Teen Pregnancies and Assault-Related Pregnancies Surge ›
- SCOTUS Decisions Jeopardize Latino Futures in the U.S. - Luz Media ›
Last week, the world lost Adilka Féliz, a woman who would still be alive if it weren’t for the total abortion ban in the Dominican Republic. Her life is one of countless that have been lost since the abortion ban was introduced in 1884, which then became constitutional in 2010 with the ratification of Article 37, declaring a right to life from the moment of conception. No matter the circumstances.
Activists have been fighting for years for the introduction of the “3 Causales,” or the three causes. The 3 Causales are exceptions to the abortion ban in the case of pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, or if the pregnancy poses a risk to the life of the mother. Despite their tireless efforts and horrific track record of avoidable maternal death, infant mortality, and a litany of other related social implications like child marriage and poverty in the Dominican Republic, the 3 Causales still aren’t a reality in the Dominican Republic and a total ban on abortion remains in place.
What Are the “3 Causales”?
¿Qué son las 3 Causales?www.youtube.com
Women and teenage girls who face unplanned or unwanted pregnancies have no safe way to handle it. Moreover, women and doctors or midwives who assist them in getting abortions face prison sentences of 2 years or 5 to 20 years, respectively. Women in the Dominican Republic are forced, by law, to carry a pregnancy full term, with no exceptions.
As it stands, the only options to deal with an unwanted, unplanned, or non-viable pregnancy in the Dominican Republic are clandestine abortions, traveling to another country, which is impossible for most women because they don’t have the resources, or continuing with the pregnancy despite serious health risks, including death.
Tragically, many women die amid this total abortion ban.
Adilka Féliz: The Latest Tragedy
Adilka Féliz, 33 years old, was a legislative assistant who advocated for the 3 Causales, amongst other issues, to help make a difference in her country. She was a daughter, a sister, a wife, and a mother of one boy, Sebastián. Tragically, Féliz died during the course of her pregnancy because she was forced to carry it to term when it should have been declared unviable. This, like many other losses, was entirely preventable.
On February 27, at 23 weeks pregnant, Féliz went into premature labor after she had been advised that her pregnancy, which presented multiple complications, needed to be terminated. As reported by the Spanish-language news site, RCC Media, the former director of the National Health Service, Chanel Rosa Chupany, reported that Féliz’s death occurred due to the doctors' refusal to perform a cesarean section during her premature labor.
Instead of performing a C-section on her, doctors decided that, due to legal reasons, she should have a natural birth. She started to push, but there were complications. Her lungs filled with liquid, and she died of a heart attack; doctors tried for half an hour to resuscitate her, but to no avail.
@pauavilg Adilka Feliz didn't have to die. An abortion would've saved her life. Help us share her mother's words and ask President Abinader to approve the three exceptions. #abortionrights #lascausalesvan #republicadominicana
According to Féliz’s mother, Berkis Paulino, who took to social media to raise awareness about the tragic loss of her daughter, Féliz’s last words were: "I, who have fought so hard for the approval of the three grounds for abortion, but how ironic is life, look at the position I find myself in today."
Paulino also made a direct plea to President Luis Abinader, writing in a Facebook post: "Mr. President, @luisabinader, you also have daughters, on behalf of Claurys Adilka Féliz Paulino, we demand to resume the approval of the three grounds in the Penal Code (with the due regulation). We, people of faith and who fear to displease God, request that these issues be regulated so that we don’t continue to lose valuable mothers and women.”
When Is Enough Is Enough?
Féliz is only the latest more high-profile case of avoidable maternal death.
In 2012, Damaris Mejía died of sepsis caused by a dead fetus in her uterus. Mejía, who was also a mother of two, was 16 weeks pregnant with her third child when she went to the hospital after experiencing severe abdominal pain. According to medical records and the first-hand accounts of her sister, Juliana Mejía, Damaris Mejía was told by several doctors that she had lost so much fluid that her unborn baby would likely die.
Photo provided by Juliana Mejía
Instead of providing a medically necessary abortion, Mejía was sent home multiple times with nothing more than pain medications. Under the total abortion ban, the medical staff argued they could not interrupt the pregnancy because while it was deemed unviable, the fetus wasn’t yet considered dead.
After her condition worsened, doctors were still unwilling to take the risk of performing a procedure that was still technically considered an abortion. Mejía died at home less than a week after she first sought help at a hospital, leaving her two children behind.
To this day, her sister Juliana Mejía continues to fight for the 3 causales in memory of her sister and to prevent future tragedies. Mejía told Luz Media that the damage didn’t end with the loss of her sister. She described a suicide attempt by her niece, an attempted suicide by the Mejías’ father, and ultimately, a successful death by suicide of their father. Their family never fully recovered from the loss of their beloved Damaris. A death that Mejía describes as “obstetric state violence.”
Photo Credit: Ana Isabel Martinez Chamorro
The Fight for Women’s Lives Continues
During his campaign, now-President Luis Abinader promised to advocate for legislation that would amend the penal code and make the 3 Causales law. As of yet, President Abdinar hasn’t kept his campaign promises. Both local and international advocates and allies are reminding him of his failure to keep his word.
Advocates for the “3 Causales” are intensifying the pressure on President Abdinar during a crucial re-election year for him when even U.S.-based Dominicans with the right to vote in Dominican elections are weighing in. Their goal is to put pressure on him to fulfill his promises.
Advocates launched a social media campaign asking the public to share the statement written by Féliz’s mother using the hashtag #PorAdilka and tagging President Abdinar’s social media handles @luisabinader, urging him to protect the lives of women and girls in the Dominican Republic.
- National Women's March: Rallying Against Deadly Abortion Restrictions ›
- La Marea Verde: Latin-American Women's Abortion Rights Movement Gains Momentum in the U.S. ›
- The Horrific Realities of the Total Abortion Ban in the Dominican Republic ›
- Arizona Supreme Court Upholds 1864 Abortion Law - Luz Media ›
I am always shocked when I hear someone say they’re not a feminist or even say that the feminist movement is this crazy new world ideology. It isn't a "trend" or something that is done to be "edgy."
The feminist movement is fighting for human lives and for the rights that we should all have when we’re born.
Events like the overturning of Roe v. Wade are more than enough proof of that. If a human being losing autonomy over their own body doesn't alarm you, I don't know what will.
In simple terms, feminism advocates for equality between men and women in all aspects of life. The concept has gotten lost for many that choose not to educate themselves on the subject and not only believe but also spread the idea that feminism is fighting for the superiority of one gender and not equality.
Furthermore, the feminist movement is not an attack on men, far from it. Feminism views all people as human beings deserving of a quality life as it fights against social injustices prevalent in our society.
There's nothing out of this world about the feminist movement; after all, one would think that there’s no reason for one gender to be lesser than the other in our society when we are all humans. But our world was built upon patriarchy, and men have been the ones in positions of power for far too long.
And yes, the movement is flawed, mainly where it concerns women of color and non-cisgender women. Women of color, queer, and trans women fight for more than just gender equality, and we can't be truly equal if we solve one issue but not the others.
The effect of poverty, racism, systematic oppression, and homophobia on women of color is also why the concept of intersectionality in feminism was introduced. Coined in 1989 by Kimberlé Crenshaw, she introduces the concept as "a prism for seeing the way in which various forms of inequality often operate together and exacerbate each other." When different forms of discrimination overlap, we can't just ignore one for the other, because if we do no equality has been achieved.
The feedoms and struggles of women in the U.S. look different for women in other countries. We need feminism because young girls and women are still fighting for fundamental human rights in many parts of the world.
In most countries in Latin America, for example, abortion is still heavily penalized, and reproductive rights for women are practically nonexistent. With some of the highest poverty rates in the world, access to contraception and sex education is not a given.
Femicide prevails across the world. About 66,000 women and girls are violently killed annually, accounting for approximately 17 percent of all victims of intentional homicides. A report published in 2016 by the Small Arms Survey, showed that "among 25 countries with the highest rates of femicide in the world, 14 are from Latin America and the Caribbean."
El Salvador and Honduras stand out with rates of more than ten female homicides per 100,000 women. The level of violence affecting women in El Salvador and Honduras exceeds the combined rate of male and female homicides in some of the 40 countries with the highest murder rates in the world, such as Ecuador, Nicaragua, and Tanzania.
Body autonomy and violence are just a few of the issues in the fight for equality. Phrases like, "I'm not one of those crazy feminists" or "women aren't oppressed," need to be used as teachable moments rather than just brushed off casually as just another knock on women. The more we destigmatize the word, the more we can actually achieve understanding from those who are willing to listen and learn.