Fasting: Legit? Or Just Another Diet Trend? A Nutritionist Explains

a plate has a fork and a knife set at the 12 and 3 position to mimic clock hands with food inbetween the utensils

This article is reposted from The Health Hub with permission.

Voluntary fasting is a practice that has been undertaken for thousands of years, but only recently has it exploded onto the scene as something that might offer unique health benefits.

But does it?


Over the last 10 years several books have been written about the importance of fasting for health and fasting has become a popular trend. People have promoted various types of fasting from daily 14-16 hour fasts to fasts that last days.
Below we are going to examine the health benefits of fasting and discuss whether these benefits warrant incorporating fasting into your life.

I also want to qualify this article by saying the information I discuss applies to fasting as a health practice, not fasting for spiritual reasons. There may be spiritual reasons for fasting that are outside of the scope of this discussion.

Types of Fasting

Photo by Estée Janssens on Unsplash

So, let’s start by defining what fasting. Fasting consists of going a period of time without eating. There are many ways that people practice fasting.

Some people follow what is called a 16:8 protocol, which consists of going for 16 hours between dinner and breakfast. Others follow a 6-hour eating window, and another approach called the one meal a day approach has become popular in recent years.

This isn’t practiced very often in the public, but many studies have utilized an alternate day fasting approach where someone completely refrains from food on one day and then eats on the alternate days.

There has also been interest in extended fasts that go beyond 24 hours. Some people have promoted 3 and 5 day fasts and sometimes even longer with various health claims attached to them. For example, this poorly cited article from Eric Berg claims that prolonged fasting regrows brain and “increases mitochondria”.

In this article we are going to discuss the claims made around fasting and discuss some common myths and misconceptions regarding fasting.

Health Benefits of Fasting

Photo by Hush Naidoo Jade Photography on Unsplash

First, I want to start off by saying that there are numerous documented health benefits of various fasting protocols. For example, a 2021 study that was an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled Trials demonstrated beneficial outcomes for body mass index, body weight, fat mass, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting plasma glucose, fasting insulin, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, and blood pressure (1)

This is clear and when people are referring to health benefits of fasting, I agree there are many documented benefits from various types of fasting protocols.

Fasting works…

But the important question is, is there something uniquely beneficial about the fasting protocol or are the benefits simply attributable to the fact that fasting causes people to eat less which leads to weight loss?

Because everything that I just stated above has also been shown for ANY type of calorie restricted weight loss diet (2). When people who are carrying excess body fat reduce their calorie intake, they lose weight and usually various aspects of their health improves - cholesterol improves, insulin sensitivity improves, and blood pressure improves…

So, what we really want to know is there any unique benefits to fasting that are separate from the reduction in calories that it can help to create?

Is Fasting Uniquely Beneficial to Health?

Photo by Hadija on Unsplash

To answer this question, we must look at studies that compare diets that are equated in calories but modify the fasting window in some way. Then we can determine if fasting is a unique strategy to improve health or simply a tool that can help some people to eat less calories which is what is serving to improve health.

There have been a few compilations of studies (called meta-analyses) on this topic. One meta-analysis published in 2020 reviewed 28 studies and concluded that fasting produces similar outcomes to calorie restriction without fasting (3). Another study published in 2022 included 43 randomized controlled trials and concluded the same. Essentially no differences between fasting and calorie restriction groups.

As of now, there really isn’t any strong evidence to support unique benefits of fasting (4).

And if you have heard other people talk about fasting and you are wondering about the effect of fasting on “autophagy” or growth hormone, let’s discuss that…

Mechanist Speculation Regarding Fasting

Photo by Jonathan Sebastiao on Unsplash

Autophagy is a process where your cells break down unused proteins to provide fuel and building blocks for essential processes during low energy states. Some people label this as “cellular cleaning” and say that it reduces disease risk.

But there is no evidence that upregulating autophagy has any specific health benefits. Autophagy is really upregulated during starvation, but does that make starvation healthy? Of course not.

This process is not something that just gets turned on during a fast. It is turned up and down depending on our energy needs and availability. Any form of calorie restriction causes an increase in autophagy as well as exercise (5).

This is what is called mechanistic speculation. It is claiming health benefits based on a short term change in a specific mechanism that occurs within the body that hasn’t even shown to be related to health outcomes.

There are a lot of people making claims about intermittent or prolonged fasting based on this type of mechanistic speculation.

Fasting is a Tool To Achieve Calorie Restriction

Photo by Artur Łuczka on Unsplash

It is important to understand that these things are simply a tool to restrict calories and there hasn’t been any evidence that demonstrates their unique benefit to health in any way.

There is one minor caveat that I want to add.

There have been some minor benefits shown with a approach to fasting called early time restricted eating. This is when someone eats more of their food in the early part of the day and cuts off their dinner early, vs. later eating patterns that are of equal calories.

Benefits of Early Time Restricted Feeding

Photo by Mehrnegar Dolatmand on Unsplash

There was a study published earlier this year in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism looked at 12 randomized controlled trials and found that early time restricted feeding showed metabolic advantages to eating approaches that provided calories later in the day (6).

This type of fasting may be an ideal approach. HOWEVER, the benefits of this eating structure are minor, compared to other variables (total calories, protein, fiber, quality of food, etc.) and I highly recommend doing what works best for you in the end.

Conclusions

Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash

So quick, review...

Fasting has lots of health benefits. However, as of now there isn’t any good research showing these benefits of fasting are independent of the lower calorie intake that it can help some people achieve.

If you enjoy fasting and it helps you to manage your calories and you have a healthy relationship with food then I think that it can be a good tool.

However, there are many people who are chasing fasting for health benefits that haven’t really been shown to be there and there are others who have a pattern of disordered eating habits who are using it as a way to restrict their eating.

I do not think that fasting is a useful tool in these scenarios.

If you do want to give fasting a try speak with your doctor and make sure there are no health concerns for you as fasting can have various unintended side effects.

Curious to learn more? Listen to the in-depth discussion on intermittent fasting and more at the Nutrition Science Podcast.

Citations and Sources:

      1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34919135/
      2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5497590/
      3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32428841/
      4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108547/
      5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6950580/
      6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36702768/
      hands holding up yellow protest signs that say Hands Off Our Bodies
      Photo Credit: Gayatri Malhotra via Unsplash

      Originally published in Common Dreams. Reprinted with permission.

      The Latino electorate will prove decisive in securing reproductive freedom and abortion access through ballot measures around the country, particularly in states where Latinos are a significant portion of the electorate.

      In November, abortion rights measures will appear on ballots across ten states, including Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Nevada, and New York, where Latinos make up a significant portion of the electorate. For decades, pundits and politicians have recycled long-held misconceptions about Latino voters and abortion access, citing our conservative and religious beliefs.

      Anti-abortion extremists have long fueled these misconceptions through misinformation and disinformation campaigns targeting Latino communities with egregious lies and inflammatory rhetoric about abortion. Yet, polling, focus groups, and direct interactions with Latino communities have debunked these outdated tropes.

      The Latino electorate will prove decisive in securing reproductive freedom and abortion access through ballot measures around the country, particularly in states where Latinos are a significant portion of the electorate.

      For Latinos, the freedom to decide, a pillar of our American democracy, is critical. Meanwhile, Latinos are being hit directly with anti-abortion efforts that take away that freedom such as the six-week abortion ban put into effect by the Florida Supreme Court and the 1864 abortion ban upheld by the Arizona Supreme Court. In the wake of the Dobbs decision, people of color and Latinas have felt the impact of a lack of abortion access, an element of basic healthcare.

      A 2023 report by the National Partnership for Women and Families estimated that nearly 6.5 million Latinas, or 42% of all Latinas of reproductive age in the country, live in a state that either had or was likely to ban abortion. Ironically, it will be abortion access and anti-choice efforts to restrict freedom of choice that will mobilize Latino voters this election.

      In a poll conducted by three national reproductive justice organizations, 87% of Latinas named abortion and women’s rights as one of their top priorities as they head to the polls. Another battleground poll conducted by Somos PAC and BSP Research found that 61% of Latino registered voters expressed a more positive/favorable view of Kamala Harris after hearing that she will protect abortion rights, versus only 19% of Latinos who said they had a more negative view of Harris after hearing that.

      In key states to secure the White House and both chambers, Latinos make up large chunks of the electorate: Arizona (25%), Colorado (15%), Florida (20%), Nevada (20%), and New York (12%). In the face of unprecedented attacks on basic healthcare access and targeted attempts by extremists to mislead and divide our community on this issue, this November Latinos will be key deciders on abortion access across the country.

      Mari Urbina, Managing Director of Indivisible, Battleground Arizona Lead and former Harry Reid advisor.

      Héctor Sánchez Barba is president and CEO of Mi Familia Vota (MFV).

      This Viral Video Game Is Changing the Face of Voter Outreach

      In 2024, voting campaigns have evolved greatly, to say the least. Creativity is now the name of the game and tongue-in-cheek humor is expertly leveraged to drive action. One example of that is Bop the Bigot, a revival of a viral game created in 2016 by Bazta Arpaio, an Arizona activist group, as part of a campaign to unseat Maricopa County’s Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Arpaio lost his re-election to Paul Penzone that year.

      The game has now been updated for the current election cycle and relaunched by On Point Studios, with new features added to enable players to find out what’s on their ballot, confirm voter status, and register to vote.

      Much like its former 2016 version, the game allows users to take out their political frustrations by virtually “bopping” GOP candidates in the head. It’s very similar to whack-a-mole, except the mole is replaced by former President Donald Trump, Ohio’s Senator J. D. Vance, and Kevin Roberts, President of the Heritage Foundation, which is spearheading Project 2025.

      cartoon renditions of Donald Trump and J.D. Vance around a Bop the Bigot logoPromotional image provided by On Point Studios.

      B. Loewe, Director of On Point Studios, came up with the concept for this game when working as the Communications Director at Bazta Arpaio in 2016, and is the executive producer of this revamped version. In the first version of the game, Bop the Bigot players used a chancla (flip flop) to “bop” the characters, tapping into Latino culture by leaning on the childhood experience of being set right by a flying chancla from a fed-up mother or grandmother.

      This year, the chancla is replaced by a more current element, a green coconut, referencing Kamala Harris’ coconut tree meme. There are also side characters like “the couch,” cat ladies, and more coconuts. All references to jokes about Vice-Presidential candidate Vance, or insults Vance has made about women on the campaign trail.

      Another new addition is that Harris’ laugh is immortalized as the game-over sound effect, an unexpected detail that adds even more humor and levity to the game.

      cartoon renditions of Donald Trump, Kevin Roberts, and J.D. Vance around a Bop the Bigot logoPromotional image provided by On Point Studios.

      Bop the Bigot, which is playable on desktop and mobile, is intended not just as a way to vent political frustrations, but also as a tool for activism and securing voter engagement.

      For example, the game supports the work of Mexican Neidi Dominguez Zamorano, Founding Executive Director of the non-profit organization Organized Power in Numbers by using the “game over” screen to prompt players to donate to it and support their efforts.

      Organized Power in Numbers is focused on empowering workers in the South and Southwest of the U.S. through collective action and comprehensive campaigns. Their mission is to create a large-scale movement that challenges the status quo and advocates for workers' rights, and racial and economic justice.

      Currently, Dominguez Zamorano is leading worker outreach to 2 million working-class voters in the South and Southwest through doorknocking, texting, and calls with the help of local groups in North Carolina, Arizona, New Mexico, and more.

      “We have been blown away by the enthusiastic reception for the video game. We knew we wanted to be part of its creative approach because our movement needs more fun and laughter. We need more ways to connect with nuestra gente so we can feel joy among all the absurdity we witness every day,” Dominguez Zamorano shared with Luz Media via email.

      “Our people are gente trabajadora and we deserve to feel uplifted even in our toughest moments. We are deeply involved in the South and Southwest so we know what’s at stake in this election and we’re happy this can be a resource to mobilize, raise spirits, and get out the vote," she concluded.

      Dominguez Zamorano is a committed activist for immigrants and workers' rights, known for her strategist skills and expertise. She played a key role in the campaign to win DACA and has also held roles in major campaigns, including as Deputy National States Director for Bernie Sanders' 2020 presidential campaign. In addition to her work with Organized Power in Numbers, Dominguez Zamorano is serving as a Senior Advisor to Mijente’s Fuera Trump Initiative.

      Grassroots efforts like these have taken on new life in 2024, with Bop the Bigot adding to the larger, ongoing fight against political apathy and disinformation. Just as it did during the 2016 race, the video game uses humor to soften the serious task at hand—getting people to the polls.

      "We want the game to be a fun and comical outlet for anyone who’s been insulted, frustrated, or harmed by Trump in the past and everyone who is ready to move forward as a country after election day," explained Loewe in a press release. "The proposals in Project 2025 and the beliefs of Trump and Vance aren’t just weird, they’re truly harmful. We wanted to give people a humorous and peaceful way to smack down their racism and sexism. We hope it makes people laugh and also feel empowered and motivated to get to the polls on or before election day."

      With a mix of satire, sharp political critique, and nostalgia, the game is a call to action. The upcoming election, which is getting closer by the minute, has sparked fierce activism and creative yet grounded initiatives like these aim to ensure voters are engaged, especially young Latinos and disenfranchised groups.